Abstract
This dissertation-in-practice (DIP) outlines a quantitative cross-sectional exploratory pilot study on the topic of interviewer gender identity and job applicant evaluation. Through the introduction of the topic, review of literature, and methodology, the real-world relevance and challenges surrounding equal-opportunity employment for women in the United States was explored. Specifically, the study explored the relationship of interviewer gender identity and job applicant evaluations. ANCOVA and Independent ttest analyses were conducted; however, limitations due to sample size restricted the statistical analyses from drawing conclusions. Descriptive statistics were used to reach conclusions. 91.67% participants reported a gender identity of female (N = 11), with the remaining participant identifying as male (N = 1). The perceived gender identity of applicants was reported as 75.00% female (N = 9) and 25.00% male (N = 3). The study revealed opportunities for the participating institution to further explore strategies that add mechanisms to recruit a more diverse applicant pool, create greater consistency in the interview process to mitigate bias, and align equity strategy with strategic priorities to create a culture appealing to all stakeholders.