1001 Is There Discrepancy Between Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Satisfaction at 5 Years Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Abraham Dada; Nima Alan; Andrew K. Chan; Erica F. Bisson; Mohamad Bydon; Anthony L. Asher; Domagoj Coric; Paul K. Kim; Matthew J. McGirt; Eric A. Potts; Jay D. Turner; et al.

doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003964_1001

Back

1001 Is There Discrepancy Between Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Satisfaction at 5 Years Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Journal article

Peer reviewed

1001 Is There Discrepancy Between Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Satisfaction at 5 Years Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Abraham Dada, Nima Alan, Andrew K. Chan, Erica F. Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, Anthony L. Asher, Domagoj Coric, Paul K. Kim, Matthew J. McGirt, Eric A. Potts, …

Neurosurgery, Vol.72(Supplement_1), pp.172-172

04/2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003964_1001

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Title: 1001 Is There Discrepancy Between Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Satisfaction at 5 Years Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?
Creators: Abraham Dada
Nima Alan
Andrew K. Chan
Erica F. Bisson
Mohamad Bydon
Anthony L. Asher
Domagoj Coric
Paul K. Kim
Matthew J. McGirt
Eric A. Potts
Jay D. Turner
et al.
Publication Details: Neurosurgery, Vol.72(Supplement_1), pp.172-172
Number of pages: 1
Identifiers: 991006263744702656
Academic Unit: Surgery
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article

1001 Is There Discrepancy Between Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Satisfaction at 5 Years Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Related links

Metrics

Details