Logo image
A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease

Andres M. Lozano, Lisa Fosdick, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Cynthia Munro, Esther Oh, Kristen E. Drake, Christopher H. Lyman, Paul B. Rosenberg, William S. Anderson, …
Journal of Alzheimer's disease, Vol.54(2), pp.777-787
09/06/2016
PMID: 27567810

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Science & Technology
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used to modulate the activity of dysfunctional brain circuits. The safety and efficacy of DBS in dementia is unknown. Objective: To assess DBS of memory circuits as a treatment for patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: We evaluated active "on" versus sham "off" bilateral DBS directed at the fornix-a major fiber bundle in the brain's memory circuit-in a randomized, double-blind trial (ClinicalTrials. gov NCT01608061) in 42 patients with mild AD. We measured cognitive function and cerebral glucose metabolism up to 12 months post-implantation. Results: Surgery and electrical stimulation were safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences in the primary cognitive outcomes (ADAS-Cog 13, CDR-SB) in the "on" versus "off" stimulation group at 12 months for the whole cohort. Patients receiving stimulation showed increased metabolism at 6 months but this was not significant at 12 months. On post-hoc analysis, there was a significant interaction between age and treatment outcome: in contrast to patients <65 years old (n = 12) whose results trended toward being worse with DBS ON versus OFF, in patients >= 65 (n = 30) DBS-f ON treatment was associated with a trend toward both benefit on clinical outcomes and a greater increase in cerebral glucose metabolism. Conclusion: DBS for AD was safe and associated with increased cerebral glucose metabolism. There were no differences in cognitive outcomes for participants as a whole, but participants aged >= 65 years may have derived benefit while there was possible worsening in patients below age 65 years with stimulation.
url
https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160017View
Published (Version of record) Open

Details

Logo image