Logo image
A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age

L.E. Sohn, N. Jagannathan, L. Sequera-Ramos, A. Sawardekar, K. Schaldenbrand and G.S. De Oliveira
Anaesthesia, Vol.69(7)
2014

Abstract

Equipment Design Female Fiber Optic Technology Humans Infant Intubation, Intratracheal Male Prospective Studies Time Factors rocuronium article bronchoscope child controlled study endotracheal intubation endotracheal tube fiberoptic guided tracheal intubation free handed guided tracheal intubation human human experiment intermethod comparison laryngeal mask normal human outcome assessment prospective study randomized controlled trial
We prospectively compared free-handed and air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. Eighty healthy children were enrolled and randomly assigned to a technique (free-handed or air-Q assisted) and operator (trainee or attending). Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required were assessed. There was no difference in median (IQR [range]) time to successful tracheal intubation between the free-handed (52.2 (34.8-67.7 [19.7-108.0]) s), and the air-Q assisted (60.3 (45.5-75.1 [28.1-129.0]) s; p = 0.13) groups, or the number of attempts needed. The air-Q assisted group required fewer manoeuvres to optimise the laryngeal view (median (IQR [range]) 0 (0-1 [0-2])) than the free-handed group (1 (1-1 [0-3]); p < 0.001). In conclusion, fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation times were similar with and without the use of the air-Q, but supraglottic airway devices may be a consideration for their other practical advantages. © 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Metrics

9 Record Views

Details

Logo image