Logo image
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Liver Metastases
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Liver Metastases

Harmeet Kaur, Nicole M. Hindman, Waddah B. Al-Refaie, Hina Arif-Tiwari, Brooks D. Cash, Victoria Chernyak, James Farrell, Joseph R. Grajo, Jeanne M. Horowitz, Michelle M. McNamara, …
Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol.14(5)
2017

Abstract

Evidence-Based Medicine Humans Liver Neoplasms Magnetic Resonance Imaging Multidetector Computed Tomography Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Radiology Societies, Medical United States fluorodeoxyglucose f 18 somatostatin receptor Article cancer survival cancer therapy diagnostic imaging disease surveillance echography human liver metastasis nuclear magnetic resonance imaging peroperative echography positron emission tomography-computed tomography practice guideline preoperative evaluation primary tumor radiation dose radiation exposure radiodiagnosis scintigraphy x-ray computed tomography diagnostic imaging evidence based medicine liver tumor medical society multidetector computed tomography radiology secondary United States
Liver metastases are the most common malignant liver tumors. The accurate and early detection and characterization of liver lesions is the key to successful treatment strategies. Increasingly, surgical resection in combination with chemotherapy is effective in significantly improving survival if all metastases are successfully resected. MRI and multiphase CT are the primary imaging modalities in the assessment of liver metastasis, with the relative preference toward multiphase CT or MRI depending upon the clinical setting (ie, surveillance or presurgical planning). The optimization of imaging parameters is a vital factor in the success of either modality. PET/CT, intraoperative ultrasound are used to supplement CT and MRI. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. © 2017 American College of Radiology
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.037View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

8 Record Views

Details

Logo image