Logo image
Achieving and Sustaining Standardized Measurement of Treatment Outcomes in Children With Cleft Lip/Palate: Pilot Study of a Multifaced Implementation Strategy
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Achieving and Sustaining Standardized Measurement of Treatment Outcomes in Children With Cleft Lip/Palate: Pilot Study of a Multifaced Implementation Strategy

Thomas J. Sitzman, Jessica L. Chee-Williams, Davinder J. Singh, Kelly Nett Cordero, Patricia Beals and Maria T. Britto
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, pp.10556656251382528-10556656251382528
10/03/2025
PMID: 41042928

Abstract

Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Surgery
Objective: Prior work has identified numerous barriers to standardized outcome measurement in cleft care. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy to collect standardized outcomes for children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Design: A one-armed, single-site pilot study of a multifaceted implementation strategy. Setting: A metropolitan children's hospital. Patients: Five-year-old children with CL/P. Interventions: A multifaceted implementation strategy for standardized outcome measurement. Main Outcomes Measures: The primary outcome measure was penetration of the intervention, defined as the proportion of children for whom the standardized measures of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes were collected. Penetration pre-implementation and 12 months post-implementation were compared. The secondary outcome was acceptability of standardized outcome measurement among providers and staff, evaluated with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Results: The implementation strategy resulted in high penetration of standardized outcome measurement: measurement of aesthetic outcomes increased from 7% to 82% (p < .0001); measurement of dental outcomes increased from 0% to 56% (p < .0001); measurement of speech outcomes increased from 29% to 77% (p = .0001). Acceptability of standardized outcome measurement was high, with 93% of cleft team providers and staff (n = 14/15) reporting that they somewhat or completely agreed that standardized outcome measurement met their approval, was appealing, was welcomed, and was liked. Penetration continued to improve after the implementation period, with high rates of outcome measure collection sustained for four years following implementation. Conclusions: Deployment of a multifaceted implementation strategy led to substantial increases in the collection of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes among children with CL/P.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image