Abstract
Individuals within a population often behave differently and these differences can be consistent over time and/or context, also termed “animal personality”. Animal personality has been commonly classified into five axes with studies aiming to validate these axes. One subject that has surprisingly not received full attention yet is the difference between the two personality axes “activity” and “exploration-avoidance”, i.e. behaviour in a known vs an unknown environment. Despite this clear difference in definition, many studies measure activity in an unknown environment and term it activity, while underlying motivations between the two environments are different.
This study aimed to detect the two personality traits “activity” and “exploration” in Atlantic cod juveniles, and to investigate whether they support the distinctive definitions proposed by previous authors. This study showed significant consistency in locomotion variation in both environments, i.e. personality. In addition, the two environments clearly elicited different behaviours; Atlantic cod juvenile behaviour was more repeatable and they moved more in the known vs the unknown environment, and no correlation of the proportional locomotion between the two was found. This demonstrates that locomotion in both environments, i.e. the personality axes “activity” and “exploration”, should not be confused nor treated as if they reflect the same personality trait.
•Activity and exploration are two commonly measured personality traits•The differences between those traits are the novelty of the environment•Activity is often measured in an unknown environment and thereby mislabeled•Cod juveniles showed no locomotion correlation in the two environments•Researchers should be more concise and definite while measuring these traits