Abstract
Studies of the city traditionally posit a division between a city's economy & its culture, with culture subordinate in explanatory power to "work." However post-industrial & globalizing trends are dramatically elevating the importance of culture. Cultural activities are increasingly crucial to urban economic vitality. Models to explain the growth of cities from the era of industrial manufacturing are outmoded. Loss of heavy industry impacts the dynamics of urban growth, increasing the relative importance of the city both as a space of consumption & as a site for "production" that is distinctly symbolic/expressive. Some have seen globalization, the wired city, & electronic communication as destroying cities as proximity should decline in importance. This may be correct for some production concerns, but this in turn raises questions about consumption vs production decisions affecting urban growth & dynamics. Even in a former industrial power like Chicago, the number one industry has become entertainment, which city officials define to include tourism, conventions, restaurants, hotels, & related economic activities. Citizens in the postindustrial city increasingly make "quality of life" demands, treating their own urban location as if tourists, emphasizing aesthetic concerns. These practices impact considerations about the proper nature of amenities that postindustrial cities can sustain. The city increasingly becomes an Entertainment Machine, leveraging culture to enhance its economic well being. The entertainment components of cities are actively & strategically produced through political & economic processes. Entertainment becomes the work of many urban participants. We elaborate this theme in general & illustrate its force with case study materials from Chicago & a national study of US mayors in cities with a 25,000+ population. 3 Tables, 2 Figures, 60 References. Adapted from the source document.