Logo image
An international multicenter matched cohort analysis of incidental meningioma progression during active surveillance or after stereotactic radiosurgery: the IMPASSE study
Journal article

An international multicenter matched cohort analysis of incidental meningioma progression during active surveillance or after stereotactic radiosurgery: the IMPASSE study

Jason Sheehan, Stylianos Pikis, Abdurrahman I Islim, Ching-Jen Chen, Adomas Bunevicius, Selcuk Peker, Yavuz Samanci, Ahmed M Nabeel, Wael A Reda, Sameh R Tawadros, …
Neuro-Oncology, Vol.24(1)
2022

Abstract

Cohort Studies Follow-Up Studies Humans Meningeal Neoplasms Meningioma Radiosurgery Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Watchful Waiting active surveillance adult Article cohort analysis computer assisted tomography conservative treatment controlled study female follow up human Karnofsky Performance Status male medical society meningioma middle aged multicenter study (topic) neuroimaging neurologic disease nuclear magnetic resonance imaging observational study outcome assessment progression free survival propensity score retrospective study statistical analysis stereotactic radiosurgery tumor growth tumor regression tumor volume World Health Organization adverse event clinical trial meningioma multicenter study radiosurgery treatment outcome watchful waiting
Background: The optimal management of patients with incidental meningiomas remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the radiologic and neurological outcomes of expectant and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) management of asymptomatic meningioma patients. Methods: Using data from 14 centers across 10 countries, the study compares SRS outcomes to active surveillance of asymptomatic meningiomas. Local tumor control of asymptomatic meningiomas and development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor were evaluated in the SRS and conservatively managed groups. Results: In the unmatched cohorts, 727 meningioma patients underwent SRS and were followed for a mean of 57.2 months. In the conservatively managed cohort, 388 patients were followed for a mean of 43.5 months. Tumor control was 99.0% of SRS and 64.2% of conservatively managed patients (P <. 001; OR 56.860 [95% CI 26.253-123.150]). New neurological deficits were 2.5% in the SRS and 2.8% of conservatively managed patients (P =. 764; OR 0.890 [95% CI 0.416-1.904]). After 1:1 propensity matching for patient age, tumor volume, location, and imaging follow-up, tumor control in the SRS and conservatively managed cohorts was 99.4% and 62.1%, respectively (P <. 001; OR 94.461 [95% CI 23.082-386.568]). In matched cohorts, new neurological deficits were noted in 2.3% of SRS-treated and 3.2% of conservatively managed patients (P =. 475; OR 0.700 [95% CI 0.263-1.863]). Conclusions: SRS affords superior radiologic tumor control compared to active surveillance without increasing the risk of neurological deficits in asymptomatic meningioma patients. While SRS and active surveillance are reasonable options, SRS appears to alter the natural history of asymptomatic meningiomas including tumor progression in the majority of patients treated. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved.

Metrics

8 Record Views

Details

Logo image