Logo image
An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat urinary radioactivity and pelvic region detection rates in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat urinary radioactivity and pelvic region detection rates in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Luke T. Nordquist, Jack R. Andrews, Phillip H. Kuo, Benjamin A. Gartrell, David Josephson, Andrei S. Purysko, Daniel R. Saltzstein, Ram A. Pathak, Neal Shore, James Sykes, …
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
02/23/2026
PMID: 41729277

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Science & Technology
Purpose This prospective, multicentre, intra-patient comparator study assessed urinary radioactivity, and patient-level and region-level detection rates (DR) with PSMA-PET radiopharmaceuticals, F-18-piflufolastat (F-18-DCFPyL) and F-18-flotufolastat (F-18-rhPSMA-7.3) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer to evaluate the hypothesis that lower urinary radioactivity is observed with F-18-flotufolastat. Methods Patients with low PSA (<= 0.5 ng/mL) BCR >= 6 months post-prostatectomy with undetectable PSA post-surgery, scheduled for standard-of-care F-18-piflufolastat PSMA-PET were enrolled. Patients underwent PET/CT 60 minutes post-F-18-piflufolastat (9 mCi) administration, and a second PET/CT on the same scanner 1-10 days later, 60 minutes post-F-18-flotufolastat (8 mCi) administration. The primary endpoint was the difference in urinary radioactivity (SUVmean) between the radiopharmaceuticals. Secondary endpoints included patient-level and region-level DR for each radiopharmaceutical, assessed by two blinded readers (a third resolved disagreements, allowing majority reads). Results Fifty-five evaluable patients (mean PSA, 0.28 ng/mL) were enrolled. Median bladder SUVmean was significantly higher with F-18-piflufolastat (29.0; interquartile range, 18.9-40.8) than F-18-flotufolastat (10.9; interquartile range, 6.0-18.5; p < 0.001 [Wilcoxon signed-rank test]). Majority read patient-level DR were 27.3% (15/55) for F-18-piflufolastat and 45.5% (25/55) for F-18-flotufolastat. Region-level DR for F-18-piflufolastat and F-18-flotufolastat, were 10.9% (6/55) and 18.2% (10/55) in the prostate bed, 14.5% (8/55) and 16.4% (9/55) in pelvic lymph nodes, and 7.3% (4/55) and 21.8% (12/55) in extra-pelvic sites. Among patients with PSA <= 0.2 ng/mL, 38.1% (8/21) and 52.4% (11/21) had positive F-18-piflufolastat and F-18-flotufolastat scans, respectively. Conclusions This intra-patient comparator shows F-18-flotufolastat has significantly lower urinary radioactivity than F-18-piflufolastat, which may help to optimise image assessment in regions close to the urinary tract.
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07732-yView
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image