Abstract
Clinical studies have suggested the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for aneurysm clipping as a feasible way to treat select intracranial aneurysms. Among neurosurgery, there is not a consensus on the utility of EEA aneurysm clipping. This review aims to define the anatomic feasibility of EEA for aneurysm clipping. Two databases (PubMed, Cochrane) were searched for anatomical studies assessing EEA for intracranial aneurysm clipping. Literature review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Quantitative anatomical studies were included. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Vascular exposure and clip placement on vessels of interest were possible, although only one study assessed these parameters with physical aneurysm models. Anterior circulation vessels, although accessible in over 90% of specimens, had low successful clipping rates in a small and large aneurysm models. Small and large model posterior circulation aneurysms were more readily clipped. Proximal and distal controls were readily attainable in posterior circulation aneurysms, but not anterior. This current literature review highlights the relevance of anatomical studies in assessing the feasibility of the EEA for clipping intracranial aneurysms. As such, anterior circulation aneurysms are poor candidates for EEA given difficulties in clip placement and obtaining proximal control and distal control in small and large aneurysms. While our results suggest that clipping of posterior circulation aneurysms is feasible from a technical stand of view, further clinical experience is required to assess its feasibility in terms of safety and efficacy, balancing the indications with endovascular treatment options. © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.