Logo image
Biomechanical Analysis of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Configurations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes: A Cadaveric Study
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Biomechanical Analysis of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Configurations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes: A Cadaveric Study

In Park, Yasuo Itami, Bobak Hedayati, Benjamin Bitner, Michelle H. McGarry, Thay Q. Lee and Sang-Jin Shin
Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol.34(11)
2018

Abstract

Acromioclavicular Joint Biomechanical Phenomena Cadaver Female Humans Joint Dislocations Ligaments, Articular Male Middle Aged Suture Techniques Sutures acromioclavicular joint adult Article biomechanics cadaver controlled study coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction coracoid process female human human tissue joint stability ligament surgery male middle aged rotation biomechanics devices joint dislocation joint ligament pathophysiology suture suture technique
Purpose: To compare the acromioclavicular (AC) joint stability of single-bundle (SB), double-bundle with an anterolateral limb (DBa), double-bundle with a posterolateral limb (DBp), and triple-bundle (TB) coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructions using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes. Methods: Eight cadaveric shoulders were used. AC joint translation and rotational stability were tested for intact and following 4 different CC reconstruction techniques: SB, DBa, DBp, and TB configurations using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes. For each reconstruction and native AC joint as control, anteroposterior (AP) and superoinferior translations were quantified using 10- and 15-N translational loads and anterior and posterior rotations were measured using 0.16- and 0.32-Nm rotational torque. Results: DBp reconstruction showed significantly better AP stability compared with SB and DBa reconstruction at 10 and 15 N (DBp: 4.1 ± 0.6 mm, SB: 7.8 ± 1.1 mm, P <.001; DBa: 6.5 ± 0.7 mm, P =.02 at 10 N; DBp: 5.5 ± 0.8 mm, SB: 10.1 ± 1.0 mm, P =.003; DBa: 9.1 ± 0.7 mm, P =.02 at 15 N). The degree of total rotation showed tendency to decrease according to increasing number of bundles; however, there were no significant differences (SB: 43.1 ± 9.2° DBa: 37.9 ± 7.3° DBp: 33.9 ± 6.8° TB: 32.2 ± 6.6° P =.37 at 0.32 Nm). Conclusions: An additional posterolateral clavicular hole for CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes resulted in better AP stability compared with SB reconstruction, whereas use of additional anterolateral clavicular hole did not show any improvement compared with SB reconstruction. Reconstruction using both anterolateral and posterolateral clavicular holes did not guarantee better stability compared with SB reconstruction. There was an increasing tendency of rotational stability with number of bundle increases, although they did not reach statistical difference. Clinical Relevance: When surgeons consider double-bundle CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes, it is better to position the lateral clavicular hole posteriorly to restore AP stability. © 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America

Metrics

8 Record Views

Details

Logo image