Abstract
Transcranial anterior petrosectomy (AP) is a classic approach; however, it is associated with adverse consequences. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been developed as an alternative. We describe surgical techniques for AP and EEA and compare the anatomic exposures of each.
Ten cadaveric heads (20 sides) were dissected. Specimens were divided into 4 groups: 1) AP, 2) EEA for medial petrosectomy (MP), 3) EEA for inferior petrosectomy (IP), and 4) EEA for inferomedial petrosectomy (IMP). Outcomes were areas of exposure, angles of attack to neurovascular structures, and bone resection volumes.
AP had a greater area of exposure than did MP and IP (P = 0.30, P < 0.01) and had a higher angle of attack to the distal part of the facial nerve–vestibulocochlear nerve (cranial nerve [CN] VII/VIII) complex than did IP and IMP (P < 0.01). MP had a lower angle of attack than IMP to the midpons (P = 0.04) and to the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (P < 0.01). Compared with IMP, IP had a lower angle of attack to the proximal part of the CN VII/VIII complex (P < 0.01) and the flocculus (P < 0.01). The bone resection volume in AP was significantly less than that in MP, IP, and IMP (P < 0.01).
AP and all EEA techniques had specific advantages for each specific area. We suggest AP for the ventrolateral pons and the anterior superior internal auditory canal, MP for the midline clivus, IP for the ventrolateral brainstem, and IMP to enhance the lateral corridor of the abducens nerve.