Logo image
Comparison of three different internal brace augmentation techniques for scapholunate dissociation: A cadaveric biomechanical study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Comparison of three different internal brace augmentation techniques for scapholunate dissociation: A cadaveric biomechanical study

Il-Jung Park, Dohyung Lim, Mauro Maniglio, Steven S. Shin, Seungbum Chae, Victor Truong, Michelle H. McGarry and Thay Q. Lee
Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol.10(7)
2021

Abstract

adult aged Article biomechanics cadaver comparative study female human human tissue male upper limb wrist
Internal bracing (IB) is an augmentation method using high-strength nonabsorbable tape. However, there is no detailed information about the direction, location, or number of IBs required for scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury repair. Thus, this study compared the biomechanical characteristics of short-transverse IB, long-oblique IB, and the combination of short-trans-verse and long-oblique (Combo) IB for SLIL injury in a biomechanical cadaveric model. We pre-pared nine fresh-frozen full upper extremity cadaveric specimens for this study. The scapholunate distance, scapholunate angle, and radioscaphoid angle were measured using the MicroScribe digit-izing system with the SLIL intact, after scapholunate dissociation and the three different reconstruc-tions. Three-dimensional digital records were obtained in six wrist positions in each experimental condition. Short-transverse IB had a similar effect compared with long-oblique IB in addressing the widening of the scapholunate distance. However, both were less effective than Combo IB. For scaphoid flexion deformity, short-transverse IB had minimal effect, while long-oblique IB had a similar effect compared to Combo IB. Combo IB was the most effective for improving distraction intensity and rotational strength. This study provides important information about the biomechanical characteristics of three different IB methods for SLIL injury and may be useful to clinicians in treating scapholunate dissociation. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071482View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

6 Record Views

Details

Logo image