Logo image
Complication rates, lengths of stay, and readmission rates in "awake" and "asleep" deep brain simulation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Complication rates, lengths of stay, and readmission rates in "awake" and "asleep" deep brain simulation

Tsinsue Chen, Zaman Mirzadeh, Kristina Chapple, Margaret Lambert and Francisco A Ponce
Journal of neurosurgery, Vol.127(2), pp.360-369
08/2017
PMID: 27662532

Abstract

Anesthesia, General Deep Brain Stimulation - adverse effects Deep Brain Stimulation - methods Female Humans Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Wakefulness
OBJECTIVE As the number of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures performed under general anesthesia ("asleep" DBS) increases, it is more important to assess the rates of adverse events, inpatient lengths of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing these procedures compared with those in patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS without general anesthesia. METHODS All patients in an institutional database who had undergone awake or asleep DBS procedures performed by a single surgeon between August 2011 and August 2014 were reviewed. Adverse events, inpatient LOS, and 30-day readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 490 electrodes were placed in 284 patients, of whom 126 (44.4%) underwent awake surgery and 158 (55.6%) underwent asleep surgery. The most frequent overall complication for the cohort was postoperative mental status change (13 patients [4.6%]), followed by hemorrhage (4 patients [1.4%]), seizure (4 patients [1.4%]), and hardware-related infection (3 patients [1.1%]). Mean LOS for all 284 patients was 1.19 ± 1.29 days (awake: 1.06 ± 0.46 days; asleep: 1.30 ± 1.67 days; p = 0.08). Overall, the 30-day readmission rate was 1.4% (1 awake patient, 3 asleep patients). There were no significant differences in complications, LOS, and 30-day readmissions between awake and asleep groups. CONCLUSIONS Both awake and asleep DBS can be performed safely with low complication rates. The authors found no significant differences between the 2 procedure groups in adverse events, inpatient LOS, and 30-day readmission rates.
url
https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.6.JNS152946View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image