Abstract
•Coronary microvascular dysfunction may play a role in development of HFpEF.•Common cardiometabolic risk factors contributing ot HfpEF create a pro-inflammatory environment that leads to endothelial dysfunction and improper regulation of vasoactive substances, impaired coronary blood flow.•Increased research is needed to have targeted therapies to best manage coronary microvascular dysfunction.•The literature review explores how race, ethnicity, sex, gender, and social determinants of health impact the disparate health outcomes for those at risk for CMD and HFpEF.
Ischemic heart disease has long been established as the leading cause of heart failure, typically as a result of hemodynamically significant and obstructive coronary anatomy. Since, the role of dysfunctional coronary microvascular pathophysiologic mechanisms have also been associated with the development of congestive heart failure (CHF), most notably heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) although with limited clinical evidence. Conventional cardiometabolic and behavioral risk factors common to HFpEF such as diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and chronic kidney disease foster a pro-inflammatory environment conducive to endothelial dysfunction and improper regulation of vasoactive substances. The impaired relaxation and increased vasoconstriction of damaged endothelium gives rise to impaired coronary blood flow and episodes of transient ischemia. Such coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has its own implication on cardiovascular pathophysiologic mechanisms beyond symptomatic coronary and myocardial ischemia, and thus its own potential prevention goals and treatment targets for patients with HFpEF, where previous management had been limited. As such, we conducted a literature review to address the current landscape of data which links CMD to HFpEF. Furthermore, we considered the implications of biopsychosocial elements such as race, ethnicity, sex, gender, and the social determinants of health as they relate to the disparate health outcomes of those most at risk for CMD and HFpEF.