Logo image
Demystifying the "July Effect" in Plastic Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Study
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Demystifying the "July Effect" in Plastic Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Study

Jordan T Blough, Sumanas W Jordan, Gildasio S De Oliveira, Jr, Michael M Vu and John Y S Kim
Aesthetic surgery journal, Vol.38(2), pp.212-224
02/17/2018
PMID: 29040397

Abstract

Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Internship and Residency - methods Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Operative Time Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Quality Improvement Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - education Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data Registries - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Surgery, Plastic - education Surgery, Plastic - statistics & numerical data United States - epidemiology Young Adult
The "July Effect" refers to a theoretical increase in complications that may occur with the influx of inexperienced interns and residents at the beginning of each academic year in July. We endeavored to determine if a July Effect occurs in plastic surgery. Plastic surgery procedures were isolated from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry. Cases involving residents were grouped as either having occurred within the first academic quarter (AQ1) or remaining year (AQ2-4). Groups were propensity matched using patient/operative factors and procedure type to account for baseline differences. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed differences in overall complications, surgical and medical complications, individual complications, length of hospital stay, and operative time. A comparison group comprised of procedures without resident involvement was also analyzed. There were 5967 cases with resident involvement, 5156 of which successfully matched. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses revealed no significant differences between AQ1 and AQ2-4 in terms of overall, surgical, medical and individual complications, or length of hospital stay. There was a statistically significant, albeit not clinically significant, increase in operative time by 10 minutes per procedure during AQ1 in comparison to AQ2-4 (P = 0.001). For procedures lacking resident participation, there were no differences between AQ1 and AQ2-4 in terms of these outcomes. A July Effect was not observed for plastic surgery procedures in our study, conceivably due to enhanced resident oversight and infrastructural safeguards. Patients electing to undergo plastic surgery early in the academic year can be reassured of their safety during this period.
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx099View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image