Logo image
Diagnostic Challenges in Sessile Serrated Lesions: Progression to Adenocarcinoma in a High-Risk Patient
Journal article

Diagnostic Challenges in Sessile Serrated Lesions: Progression to Adenocarcinoma in a High-Risk Patient

Shah Ahmed, Harshaman Kaur, Mohamad Omar Diab and Abdul Nadir
The American journal of case reports, Vol.26, p.e950179
10/13/2025
PMID: 41077740

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Adenocarcinoma - genetics Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Aged Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonic Polyps - pathology Colonic Polyps - surgery Colonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Diagnosis, Differential Disease Progression Humans Male Proto-Oncogene Mas Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursors in approximately 20-30% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, often characterized by B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) mutations and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and follow the serrated neoplasia pathway. Histopathological differentiation between SSLs with dysplasia and conventional adenomas is diagnostically challenging because their visual and pathologic features often overlap. SSLs with dysplasia carry a high malignant potential and can progress rapidly to invasive carcinoma, underscoring the need for accurate classification and timely intervention. CASE REPORT A 78-year-old man with a history of acute myeloid leukemia (treated with bone marrow transplant), Barrett's esophagus, and ulcerative colitis in remission underwent colonoscopy, which identified an 11-mm polyp. It was resected piecemeal and initially reported as showing features of both a sessile serrated adenoma (SSA) and a tubular adenoma (TA). Given the mixed histology, a follow-up colonoscopy was performed 6 months later, revealing an invasive, moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma with mismatch repair deficiency (loss of MLH1 and PMS2) and a BRAF V600E mutation. Surgical resection confirmed stage III CRC with lymph node involvement. Retrospective pathological review reclassified the original lesion as an SSL with dysplasia (SSL-D). CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of SSLs, particularly when lesions are resected piecemeal. For accurate diagnosis and optimal patient management, it is essential that there is effective communication between pathologists and endoscopists about the morphological characteristics of the polyp, and the reading pathologists should communicate with endoscopists for any clarification. A multidisciplinary, collaborative approach is crucial for high-risk lesions.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image