Abstract
To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite to dentin contaminated with artificial saliva (AS) containing mucin and amylase using an experimental method controlling the volume of saliva and adhesive in a defined surface area.
Flat bonding surfaces were prepared on extracted human molars (320 grit surface). Using adhesive tape, a 4.5 mm bonding window was prepared on the dentin surfaces. Groups (n= 12) were prepared using the etch & rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) modes for Adhese Universal (ADH), Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU), and Prime & Bond active (PBA) dental adhesives (DA). For the control (C) groups, the adhesives were applied per the manufacturers' instructions with 2.0 µl or 3.0 µl of the adhesive. For the saliva-contaminated groups, 1.0 µl of artificial saliva with mucin was applied in the bonding window either dried or allowed to remain wet before the application of either 2.0 µl or 3.0 µl of the adhesive. After the adhesive film was air dried and light cured using an Ultradent bonding fixture, Spectrum TPH3 was bonded to the prepared surfaces. After water storage for 24 hours at 37°C, the specimens were debonded and shear bond strength (SBS) was calculated (MPa). A Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction was used to determine group differences (P< 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to visualize the interfacial surfaces prepared using an ion-etching technique.
Mean SBS for the three adhesives were similar in both ER and SE modes to uncontaminated dentin surfaces for all the control groups. For dentin contaminated with dried or wet saliva, both the surface condition and the adhesive system were significant factors at a confidence level of 95%. For the dried saliva test groups, ADH and PBA with 3.0 µl of adhesive generated similar SBS values to controls while SBU generated lower values. Lower values were generated when using 2.0 µl of adhesive for the three adhesives in SE and ER modes except for PBA in the ER mode. Using wet saliva and 3.0 µl of adhesive ADH and SBU generated lower SBS values while PBA generated similar values to controls. Under SEM, morphology at the adhesive dentin interfaces was similar among the adhesives to uncontaminated dentin but notable differences were observed for SBU and ADH for both wet and dried saliva-contaminated surfaces.
Salivary contamination differentially affects shear bond strength and the morphology of the bonded interface of universal adhesives to dentin. These differences are specific to the adhesive tested and are influenced by using the etch and rinse or self-etch strategies and the volume of adhesive used. When concerned about salivary contamination clinically, maximizing the volume of adhesive on the substrate may help mitigate the deleterious effects of saliva contamination.