Abstract
Digital technologies hold promise for transforming healthcare by enhancing personalized treatments and offer valuable opportunities to improve patient care. Here, we evaluated several novel, self-administered, home-based, digital endpoints for their association with corresponding conventional standard clinical measures (primary) in people living with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
This was a longitudinal study in people with ALS who were followed up to 9 months. A total of 33 participants were enrolled in the study. At each of six visits, participants were evaluated with a battery of conventional standard measurements to determine ALS disease progression and quality of life. Between visits, participants performed weekly home-based self-assessments with digital health technologies (DHT) and self-administered ALSFRS-R. Cross-sectional analysis of DHTs anchored to ALSFRS-R and longitudinal analyses were performed and compared to standard clinical measures.
Of the 33 participants, 20 completed the study, and 13 discontinued before completing the planned 9-month follow-up mainly due to disease progression. The distribution of various digital metrics in home-based assessments corresponded well with the sub-scores of ALSFRS-R in the cross-sectional analyses, with the strongest construct validity for digital speaking rate. In the longitudinal analysis, a weak but significant trend in most metrics was observed, with the strongest trend in the duration of the Timed Up and Go (high variability between participants).
The findings from this study provide insights into the potential of digital endpoints to evaluate people living with ALS with the goal of reducing the burden of study participation and improving the efficiency of ALS clinical trials.