Logo image
Evolution and impact of lymph node dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Evolution and impact of lymph node dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

Mariam F. Eskander, Susanna W.L. de Geus, Gyulnara G. Kasumova, Sing Chau Ng, Waddah Al-Refaie, Gamze Ayata and Jennifer F. Tseng
Surgery (United States), Vol.161(4)
2017

Abstract

Adult Aged Cohort Studies Databases, Factual Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Logistic Models Lymph Node Excision Lymph Nodes Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness Neoplasm Staging Odds Ratio Pancreatic Neoplasms Pancreaticoduodenectomy Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome Young Adult antineoplastic agent adult age aged cancer chemotherapy cancer patient cancer prognosis cancer radiotherapy cancer staging cancer surgery cancer survival chemoradiotherapy Conference Paper controlled study data base female human lymph node dissection lymph node metastasis major clinical study male overall survival pancreas adenocarcinoma pancreaticoduodenectomy priority journal stomach antrum resection cohort analysis disease free survival factual database Kaplan Meier method lymph node lymph node dissection middle aged mortality odds ratio Pancreatic Neoplasms pancreaticoduodenectomy pathology procedures prognosis proportional hazards model retrospective study risk assessment statistical model statistics and numerical data survival analysis treatment outcome tumor invasion young adult
Background Insufficient examination of lymph nodes after pancreaticoduodenectomy can lead some pancreatic cancer patients with N1 disease to be misclassified as N0. We examined trends in lymph node dissection throughout time and investigated how these changes affect lymph node status and its prognostic value. Methods The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2004–2013) who underwent classic pancreaticoduodenectomy with antrectomy. Logistic regression was performed for odds of node positivity. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of lymph node status on overall survival for patients diagnosed during 2-year intervals from 2004–2012. Results Median number of examined lymph nodes was 10 (interquartile range 6–15) in 2004 vs 17 (interquartile range 12–24) in 2013. Number of lymph nodes examined was a significant predictor of N1 disease (P < .0001), with a plateau at 30 nodes. N1 disease increased from 64.4% to 68.0% (P < .0001). Survival for both N1 and N0 subgroups improved. In successive multivariate models, N0 versus N1 status was consistently protective for overall survival (P < .0001), but there was no change in the magnitude of its hazard ratio over time (overall hazard ratio 0.691; 95% confidence interval 0.660–0.723). Conclusion Contemporary patients have an adequate number of nodes examined during standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. This, along with rising rates of N1 cancer detection and improved survival for both node-positive and node-negative patients, suggest more accurate classification of lymph node status. However, no increased benefit is achieved beyond 30 nodes. Overall, lymph node status remains a strong prognosticator for overall survival. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.

Details

Logo image