Abstract
Transcranial anterior clinoidectomy is a conventional microsurgical approach for treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is an alternative method for clipping intracranial aneurysms. No analysis has been conducted to anatomically compare approaches with respect to treating paraclinoid aneurysms. The surgical anatomical exposures of the paraclinoid region during transcranial extradural anterior clinoidectomy (EAC) and the endoscopic endonasal transplanum-cavernous approach (EETC) are described and quantitatively assessed.
Seven cadaveric heads underwent EAC and EETC. Measurements included the area of exposure, volume of surgical freedom, angle of attack, ophthalmic artery (OphA) origin, and coronal exposure angle of the internal carotid artery (ICA).
The EETC provided a larger area of exposure than the EAC (100.1±24.9 vs 76.1±12.9 mm
, p = 0.04). The EAC provided a higher volume of surgical freedom and greater angle of attack than the EETC in all neurovascular parameters, including the OphA, superior hypophyseal artery (SHA), distal ICA, and distal dural ring (all p < 0.001). The OphA origin was intradural in 85.7% and extradural in 14.3% of specimens. With regard to the coronal angle of exposure, the EAC exposed the OphA and SHA in the upper lateral quadrant (67.9±7.8° and 80.6±4.5°, respectively) and the distal ICA in the upper medial and upper lateral quadrants (92±7.5°). The EEA exposed the OphA, SHA, and distal ICA in the upper medial and lower medial quadrants (130.4±10.7°, 68.4±10.8°, and 58±11.4°, respectively).
The EAC and EETC each offer specific advantages for paraclinoid region exposure. The EAC is appropriate for paraclinoid aneurysms that occur at the dorsolateral surface of the paraclinoid ICA. The EETC is an alternative approach for aneurysms that occur along medial surface of the paraclinoid ICA (e.g., carotid cave and SHA aneurysms). The EETC provides greater surgical exposure to the medial aspect of the paraclinoid ICA.