Abstract
Conventional dental radiography uses 60 mm-wide x-ray beams that irradiate the cheeks. To reduce the dose of radiation, months or years can separate serial films and prevent short-term assessment of disease activity. A technique that uses a 13 mm narrow x-ray beam that avoids the cheeks was compared with a wide x-ray beam by using a contrast phantom, a cheek substitute, and a serially sectioned dry mandible. Phantom contrast was measured densitometrically at 50 kVp, 65 kVp, and 90 kVp with wide x-ray beam and narrow x-ray beam and with and without cheek scatter. The narrow x-ray beam without cheek scatter technique resulted in better contrast (0.06 to 0.04 OD) than the wide x-ray beam with cheek scatter (0.05 to 0.02 OD). A posterior interdental crest was irradiated and a trabecular rod was removed. The bone detail was best in the images produced with the narrow x-ray beam without cheek scatter. The area of the narrow x-ray beam was 4.35% of the area of the wide x-ray beam with approximately 5% of the dose. Short-interval (weekly), very-low-dose radiography should be possible with improved contrast to assess alveolar bone changes.