Abstract
This article is about Professor Robert Leflar's Better Law System, in which five choice-influencing considerations are used in choice-of-law cases. This article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the system and offers suggestions on how to improve the considerations and the system as a whole. The article focuses on the rearrangement of the five considerations in hierarchical order, the reformulation of the content of each of the considerations, and the revisions of the descriptive titles of some of the considerations.