Logo image
Integration of machine learning and mechanistic models accurately predicts variation in cell density of glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Integration of machine learning and mechanistic models accurately predicts variation in cell density of glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI

Nathan Gaw, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Leland S Hu, Hyunsoo Yoon, Lujia Wang, Yanzhe Xu, Pamela R Jackson, Kyle W Singleton, Leslie C Baxter, Jennifer Eschbacher, …
Scientific reports, Vol.9(1), pp.10063-9
07/11/2019
PMID: 31296889

Abstract

Algorithms Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Cell Count Glioblastoma - diagnostic imaging Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Machine Learning Models, Statistical Models, Theoretical Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Prognosis
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a heterogeneous and lethal brain cancer. These tumors are followed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is unable to precisely identify tumor cell invasion, impairing effective surgery and radiation planning. We present a novel hybrid model, based on multiparametric intensities, which combines machine learning (ML) with a mechanistic model of tumor growth to provide spatially resolved tumor cell density predictions. The ML component is an imaging data-driven graph-based semi-supervised learning model and we use the Proliferation-Invasion (PI) mechanistic tumor growth model. We thus refer to the hybrid model as the ML-PI model. The hybrid model was trained using 82 image-localized biopsies from 18 primary GBM patients with pre-operative MRI using a leave-one-patient-out cross validation framework. A Relief algorithm was developed to quantify relative contributions from the data sources. The ML-PI model statistically significantly outperformed (p < 0.001) both individual models, ML and PI, achieving a mean absolute predicted error (MAPE) of 0.106 ± 0.125 versus 0.199 ± 0.186 (ML) and 0.227 ± 0.215 (PI), respectively. Associated Pearson correlation coefficients for ML-PI, ML, and PI were 0.838, 0.518, and 0.437, respectively. The Relief algorithm showed the PI model had the greatest contribution to the result, emphasizing the importance of the hybrid model in achieving the high accuracy.
url
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46296-4View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image