Is the Prudent Layperson Standard Really a "Standard"?

J. S. Stapczynski

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.048

Back

Is the Prudent Layperson Standard Really a "Standard"?

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Is the Prudent Layperson Standard Really a "Standard"?

J. S. Stapczynski

Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol.43(2), pp.163-165

2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.048

Abstract

cost control

disease management

documentation

editorial

emergency treatment

emergency ward

employer

financial management

health care cost

health care planning

health care policy

health care quality

health maintenance organization

injury

managed care

medicaid

medicare

patient care

priority journal

reliability

standard

Files and links (2)

url

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0942279734&doi=10.1016%2fj.annemergmed.2003.10.048&partnerID=40&md5=aef847d6a4c339bcaf737b248d0e3680View

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.048View

Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Title: Is the Prudent Layperson Standard Really a "Standard"?
Creators: J. S. Stapczynski - University of Kentucky
Publication Details: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol.43(2), pp.163-165
Publisher: Mosby Inc.
Identifiers: 991006028695002656
Academic Unit: Emergency Medicine
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article