Abstract
ABS T R A C T Background: Performing a successful microsurgical vascular anastomosis (MVA) is challenging and requires lots of practice. However, the most efficient practice protocol is yet to be found. We aimed to compare and analyze two major practice patterns for fine motor tasks as applied to learning MVA: dis-tributed and mass practice protocols. Ten neurosurgeons with comparable experience in microsurgery (but no experience in vascular anastomosis) were randomized to practice MVA either using a distributed (1 session/day) or a mass practice (6 sessions/day) protocol. A total of 24 sessions of practice and 2 recall test sessions were given. Anastomosis score, time to complete a single stitch and the total time to com-plete an anastomosis were recorded. Mass practice protocol caused a clear fatigue effect observed toward the end of each mass practice trial block. Statistical comparison using one-way analysis of variance showed significantly higher anastomosis scores and shorter times to place a single stitch as well as to complete the anastomosis in distributed practice group for the last 3 acquisition practice trials, and the 2 recall tests (p < 0.05). The relative advantage of the distributed practice protocol could be attributed to forgetting/spacing effect. Although mass practice protocol resulted in worse performance, it still showed a gradual improvement trend in performance from beginning to the end. Therefore, certain adjustments to a mass practice protocol (such as increasing the number of practice blocks) could poten-tially lead to an eventual performance level comparable to a distributed protocol. This point is a subject of further investigation. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.