Logo image
Optimal entry point and trajectory for endoscopic third ventriculostomy: evaluation of 53 patients with volumetric imaging guidance
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Optimal entry point and trajectory for endoscopic third ventriculostomy: evaluation of 53 patients with volumetric imaging guidance

Fangxiang Chen and Peter Nakaji
Journal of neurosurgery, Vol.116(5), pp.1153-1157
05/01/2012
PMID: 22404672

Abstract

Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging - physiology Child Child, Preschool Cranial Sutures - anatomy & histology Cranial Sutures - surgery Data Interpretation, Statistical Endoscopy - methods Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Neurosurgical Procedures - methods Sex Characteristics Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Third Ventricle - anatomy & histology Third Ventricle - surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ventriculostomy - methods Young Adult
An optimal entry point for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) helps protect critical structures from undue manipulation. A commonly accepted ideal entry point is 3 cm from the midline and 1 cm anterior to the coronal suture. The authors of this study reexamine this ideal entry point. Trajectory views from MR images or CT scans used for cranial image guidance in 53 patients (age range 3-85 years) who had undergone ETV were retrospectively evaluated. The trajectory from the tuber cinereum back through the center of the foramen of Monro was projected to the surface of the head. The relation of the entry point to the midline and the coronal suture was established. The mean perpendicular distance from the ideal entry point to the midline was 30.1 ± 7 mm (median 31.9 mm, range 12.5-42.2 mm). The mean perpendicular distance to the coronal suture was 8.9 ± 14.1 mm posterior (median 10.4 mm), ranging from 30.6 mm anterior to 35.8 mm posterior. The entry point tended to be located more posteriorly in women and adults: 5.8 ± 15.4 mm posterior in males versus 13.1 ± 13.2 mm posterior in females (p = 0.08) and 9.1 ± 14.8 mm posterior in adults versus 8.2 ± 11.7 mm posterior in children (p = 0.84). While the entry point may need to be modified from the ideal trajectory for other anatomical reasons, such as a trajectory through the motor cortex, in general, the authors found that the optimal entry point for ETV was more posterior than previously published and highly variable. Using image guidance or a customized trajectory based on analysis of a patient's own imaging is highly preferable to using an empirical ideal trajectory.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image