Abstract
The functional outcome of a mutilating hand injury cannot be fully assessed at the time of injury alone. The measure of functional outcome must incorporate the evaluation and severity of the initial injury and the subsequent reconstructive surgeries. The complexity of the hand deserves no less. Restoration of prehensile function is the top priority in reconstruction following mutilating hand injuries, and assessment of outcome should address this goal. Flaps and specialized tissue grafts can restore architecture and balance in the hand. One can reconstruct a thumb and fingers with the big toe and smaller toes to give a functional sensate grip. The assessment of functional outcome should include not only objective measures but also subjective questionnaires that focus on issues most relevant to the patient. The use of questionnaires that have been shown to be valid, reliable, consistent, responsive, and sensitive allows the most meaningful conclusions about and comparisons between treatments. Perhaps because of the unique challenges presented by mutilating hand injuries, a new instrument, specific to mutilating hand injury, may provide the most beneficial information to guide treatment and assess outcome.