Abstract
Abstract only
209
Background: G-CSF are used for prophylactic and therapeutic treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). NCCN guidelines (version 1.2015) recommend prophylactic use of G-CSF based on the chemotherapy regimen and patient related risk factors, especially for the high (> 20%) and intermediate (10-20%) risk groups for developing FN. This study investigates the practice patterns and adherence to NCCN guidelines for use of G-CSF at a community based academic outpatient facility. Methods: Cleveland Clinic IRB was obtained. Charts of all patients with underlying non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer, treated in the year 2013, were reviewed for G-CSF use on their initial chemotherapy encounter. Risk assessment for developing FN was assessed based on individual risk factors and chemotherapy regimen. Analysis was obtained for appropriate guideline based use of G-CSF. Results: A total of 172 (n = 172) patients were included in the study. Overall, 63% (108/172) of patients had breast cancer; 81% (140/172) were female, most patients (64%, 108/170) were aged < 65 years; 29% (49/172) had metastatic disease; and almost all patients (91%, 106/117) had good ECOG performance status (0 or 1). The overall risk of FN was estimated to be low (< 10%) for 9% (16/172) of patients, intermediate (10-20%) for 45% (77/172) of patients, and high (> 20%) for 45%. Overall, 5% (8/172) of patients did not follow the NCCN guidelines. Only 86% of the patients in metastatic group were adherent to NCCN guidelines compared to 99% of patients in non-metastatic group (p< .01). Among patients with metastatic disease, 14% (7/49) did not follow NCCN guidelines; in a univariable analysis, among patients with metastatic disease - risk of neutropenia (p < .0001), age (p < .01), and prior chemotherapy and or radiation (p = .04), were associated with whether or not the NCCN guidelines were followed. Conclusions: In our limited study population, more use of G-CSF was seen among patients with metastatic cancer with a higher number of metastatic patients being non-adherent to NCCN guidelines. Further research is required to elucidate the potential benefit and cost-effectiveness of G-CSF use in the palliative setting.