Logo image
Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model

Michael A. Bohl, Sarah McBryan, Anna G. U. S. Newcomb, Jennifer N. Lehrman, Brian P. Kelly, Peter Nakaji, Steve W. Chang, Juan S. Uribe, Jay D. Turner and U. Kumar Kakarla
Global spine journal, Vol.10(4), pp.419-424
06/01/2020
PMID: 32435561

Abstract

Clinical Neurology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences & Neurology Orthopedics Science & Technology
Study Design: Biomechanical model study. Objective: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. Methods: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. Results: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0 degrees vs 14.0 degrees) and L4-5 (3.9 degrees vs 15.2 degrees). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). Conclusions: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability.
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image