Logo image
Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Suspension Button Fixation Technique
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Suspension Button Fixation Technique

Gregory H. Lee, Orr Limpisvasti, Maxwell C. Park, Michelle H. McGarry, Lewis A. Yocum and Thay Q. Lee
American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol.38(3)
2010

Abstract

Adult Bone Resorption Cadaver Collateral Ligaments Elbow Elbow Joint Female Humans Male Middle Aged Range of Motion, Articular Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Torque Transplantation, Autologous Ulna Young Adult adult article autotransplantation cadaver elbow evaluation female human injury joint characteristics and functions ligament male methodology middle aged osteolysis physiology plastic surgery torque ulna
Background: Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction remains a challenging problem. The objective of this study was to biomechanically evaluate an ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique using a suspension button fixation technique that can be used even in the case of ulnar cortical bone loss. Hypothesis: An ulnar suspension fixation technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction can restore elbow kinematics and demonstrate failure strength comparable to that of currently available techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine pairs of cadaveric elbows were dissected free of soft tissue and potted. After simulating ulnar cortical bone loss, ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction was performed in 1 elbow of each pair using palmaris longus autograft and a 30-mm RetroButton suspended from the far (lateralmost) ulnar cortex. A docking technique was used for humeral fixation of the graft. Elbow valgus angle was quantified using a Microscribe 3DLX digitizer at multiple elbow flexion angles. Valgus angle was measured with the ulnar collateral ligament intact, transected, and reconstructed. In addition, load-to-failure testing was performed in 1 elbow of each pair. Results: Release of the ulnar collateral ligament caused a significant increase in valgus angle at each flexion angle tested (P <.002). Reconstructed elbows demonstrated no significant differences in valgus angle from the intact elbow at all flexion angles tested. Load-to-failure tests showed that reconstructed elbows had an ultimate torque (10.3 ± 5.7 N·m) significantly less than intact elbows (26.4 ± 10.6 N·m) (P =.001). Conclusion: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique reliably restored elbow kinematics to the intact state. Load-to-failure testing demonstrated comparable fixation strength to several historic controls of primary reconstruction techniques despite the simulated ulnar cortical bone loss. Clinical Relevance: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique can be considered in the case of ulnar cortical bone loss in a primary or revision setting. © 2010 The Author(s).

Metrics

2 Record Views

Details

Logo image