Abstract
The trial of Saddam Hussein on charges of genocide for gassing thousands of Iraqi Kurds in Halabja and elsewhere during the Anfal campaigns and against the Marsh Arabs in southern Iraq will be difficult. Prosecutors must prove before the Iraqi Special Tribunal Hussein's specific intent to commit genocide. Saddam will be able to argue that his intent was other than genocide. Among the arguments he may present, economic security, repelling Iranian forces and political cohesion may be the strongest. This paper examines the strategies that both defense and prosecution attorneys will consider as Saddam's trial for genocide gets underway.