Logo image
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of the Brainstem Safe Entry Zones Based on Internal Structures
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of the Brainstem Safe Entry Zones Based on Internal Structures

Juan Leonardo Serrato-Avila, Juan Alberto Paz Archila, Marcos Devanir Silva da Costa, Guilherme Salemi Riechelmann, Paulo Ricardo Rocha, Sergio Ricardo Marques, Luis Otavio Carvalho de Moraes, Sergio Cavalheiro, Kaan Yağmurlu, Michael T. Lawton, …
World neurosurgery, Vol.158, pp.e64-e74
02/01/2022
PMID: 34715371

Abstract

Brainstem Fiber tracts Microsurgical anatomy Safe entry zones
Objective: Brainstem safe entry zones (EZs) are gates to access the intrinsic pathology of the brainstem. We performed a quantitative analysis of the intrinsic surgical corridor limits of the most commonly used EZs and illustrated these through an inside perspective using 2-dimensional photographs, 3-dimensional photographs, and interactive 3-dimensional model reconstructions. Methods: A total of 26 human brainstems (52 sides) with the cerebellum attached were prepared using the Klingler method and dissected. The safe working areas and distances for each EZ were defined according to the eloquent fiber tracts and nuclei. Results: The largest safe distance corresponded to the depth for the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (4.8 mm), supratrigeminal (10 mm), epitrigeminal (13.2 mm), peritrigeminal (13.3 mm), lateral transpeduncular (22.3 mm), and infracollicular (4.6 mm); the rostrocaudal axis for the perioculomotor (11.7 mm), suprafacial (12.6 mm), and transolivary (12.8 mm); and the mediolateral axis for the supracollicular (9.1 mm) and infracollicular (7 mm) EZs. The safe working areas were 46.7 mm for the perioculomotor, 21.3 mm for the supracollicular, 14.8 mm for the infracollicular, 33.1 mm for the supratrigeminal, 34.3 mm for the suprafacial, 21.9 mm for the infrafacial, and 51.7 mm for the transolivary EZs. Conclusions: The largest safe distance in most EZs corresponded to the depth, followed by the rostrocaudal axis and, finally, the mediolateral axis. The transolivary had the largest safe working area of all EZs. The supracollicular EZ had the largest safe area to access the midbrain tectum and the suprafacial EZ for the floor of the fourth ventricle.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image