Abstract
Uncertainty visualisation is important for data transparency, especially for map visualisations where data is often aggregated. Despite the importance of this area, studies evaluating uncertainty visualisation lack consensus and produce conflicting results. This work introduces a new evaluation approach for uncertainty visualisation that attempts to assess uncertainty as noise, rather than signal. We evaluate five methods of visualising uncertainty: standard choropleth maps, value/variance bivariate maps, value-suppressing uncertainty palettes, overlaid sampling, and pixelated sampling maps. Built on principles of implicit testing, we put an 'uncertainty visualisation' spin on the classic Ishihara colourblind test to create a novel test that is able to evaluate uncertainty as noise. We compare signal visibility to conventional hypothesis tests at various levels of group separation. By building our experimental design on top of established graphics theory, we isolate the plot components that facilitate successful signal suppression and establish foundational theory for the perception of uncertainty visualisation.